A UN climate conference reached a hard-fought agreement Sunday on a complex and far-reaching program meant to set a new course for the global fight against climate change for the coming decades.
The 194-party conference agreed to start negotiations on a new accord that would put all countries under the same legal regime enforcing commitments to control greenhouse gases. It would take effect by 2020 at the latest.
The deal also set up the bodies that will collect, govern and distribute tens of billions of dollars a year for poor countries. Other documents in the package lay out rules for monitoring and verifying emissions reductions, protecting forests, transferring clean technologies to developing countries and scores of technical issues.
Currently, only industrial countries have legally binding emissions targets under the 1997 Kyoto Protocol. Those commitments expire next year, but they will be extended for another five years under the accord adopted Sunday.
The proposed Durban Platform offered answers to problems that have bedeviled global warming negotiations for years about sharing the responsibility for controlling carbon emissions and helping the world's poorest and most climate-vulnerable nations cope with changing forces of nature.
Environment Minister Peter Kent said he was cautiously optimistic a new agreement could be reached by 2015.
"The Durban Platform sets out a process to negotiate a new climate change treaty that would create binding commitments for all major emitters," he said Sunday.
Canada has pushed to include countries like Brazil, South Africa, India and China, whose emissions are rising along with their growing economies, in any new deal.
Kent also reiterated that the federal government would not undertake a second Kyoto commitment.
He also said Canada would not contribute "scarce dollars" to a Green Climate Fund until all major emitters accept binding reduction targets.
The United States, meanwhile, was a reluctant supporter, concerned about agreeing to join an international climate system that likely would find much opposition in the U.S. Congress.
"This is a very significant package. None of us likes everything in it. Believe me, there is plenty the United States is not thrilled about," U.S. climate envoy Todd Stern said. But the package captured important advances that would be undone if it is rejected, he told the delegates.
A statement from UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon's office called Sunday's decision "essential for stimulating greater action" to tackle the challenges of climate change.
The release said Ban was "gratified" with several of the agreements in the deal, including a second commitment to extend the Kyoto Protocol and the establishment of a Green Climate Fund.
"Taken together, these agreements represent an important advance in our work on climate change," the statement said, adding that the secretary-general urges that all nations involved in the deal implement the changes quickly.
Sunday's breakthrough capped 13 days of hectic negotiations that ran a day and a half over schedule, including two round-the-clock days that left negotiators bleary-eyed and stumbling with words. Delegates were seen nodding off in the final plenary session, despite the high drama, barely constrained emotions and uncertainty whether the talks would end in triumph or total collapse.
The nearly fatal issue involved the legal nature of the accord that will govern carbon emissions by the turn of the next decade.
A plan put forward by the European Union sought strong language that would bind all countries equally to carry out their emissions commitments
India led the objectors, saying it wanted a less rigorous option. Environment Minister Jayanthi Natarajan argued that the EU proposal undermined the 20-year-old principle that developing countries have less responsibility than industrial nations that caused the global warming problem through 200 years of pollution.
"The equity of burden-sharing cannot be shifted," she said in angry tones.
Chinese negotiator Xie Zhenhua gave heated support for the Indians, saying the industrial nations have not lived up to their promises while China and other developing countries had launched ambitious green programs.
"We are doing whatever we should do. We are doing things you re not doing. What qualifies you to say things like this," he said, raising his voice and waving his arm.
The debate ran past midnight and grew increasingly tense as speakers lined up almost evenly on one side or the other.
Conference president Maite Nkoana-Mashabane, who is South Africa's foreign minister, called a recess and told the EU and Indian delegates to put their heads together and come up with a compromise formula.
Coming after weeks of unsuccessful effort to resolve the issue, Nkoana-Mashabane gave Natarajan and European Commissioner Connie Hedegaard 10 minutes to find a solution, with hundreds of delegates milling around them. They needed 50 minutes.